Comments on: Photoshop: Which Anti-Alias Setting is Best? http://tutorialblog.org/photoshop-which-anti-alias-setting-is-best/ High Quality Photoshop Tutorials, Tips and other Great Things... Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:28:25 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: fred - http://www.aestrada.ca http://tutorialblog.org/photoshop-which-anti-alias-setting-is-best/comment-page-1/#comment-24487 fred - http://www.aestrada.ca Sat, 03 May 2008 20:55:36 +0000 http://tutorialblog.org/photoshop-which-anti-alias-setting-is-best/#comment-24487 Anti-alias at none is good to simulate web fonts in a photoshop template Anti-alias at Sharp is good to make menus or have small text (under 15pt) The rest is the choice of the designer. Anti-alias at none is good to simulate web fonts in a photoshop template
Anti-alias at Sharp is good to make menus or have small text (under 15pt)

The rest is the choice of the designer.

]]> By: Casper - http://www.spoiledmilk.dk http://tutorialblog.org/photoshop-which-anti-alias-setting-is-best/comment-page-1/#comment-24477 Casper - http://www.spoiledmilk.dk Sat, 26 Apr 2008 16:46:53 +0000 http://tutorialblog.org/photoshop-which-anti-alias-setting-is-best/#comment-24477 I've got a good tip if you have a font which visibility is bad when using anti-alias in Photoshop. Duplicate the text layer (set to crisp) and set the opacity to 75% or thereabouts. Should be more crisp than any of the other settings. Works great if you have a thin and small font. I’ve got a good tip if you have a font which visibility is bad when using anti-alias in Photoshop. Duplicate the text layer (set to crisp) and set the opacity to 75% or thereabouts. Should be more crisp than any of the other settings. Works great if you have a thin and small font.

]]> By: Blaise Kal - http://blaisekal.nl http://tutorialblog.org/photoshop-which-anti-alias-setting-is-best/comment-page-1/#comment-24476 Blaise Kal - http://blaisekal.nl Fri, 25 Apr 2008 07:12:47 +0000 http://tutorialblog.org/photoshop-which-anti-alias-setting-is-best/#comment-24476 Medium to large text: almost always "sharp" because it makes the text stick to the pixel, thus making it look clean and sharp without any blurry edges. At smaller sizes, "sharp" sometimes transforms the type too much. If anti-aliasing suffocates very small text, the type is probably too small for reading anyway. I don't find the last two examples easily readable, neither anti-aliased nor aliased. Medium to large text: almost always “sharp” because it makes the text stick to the pixel, thus making it look clean and sharp without any blurry edges. At smaller sizes, “sharp” sometimes transforms the type too much.

If anti-aliasing suffocates very small text, the type is probably too small for reading anyway. I don’t find the last two examples easily readable, neither anti-aliased nor aliased.

]]>